Justice for Danish Siddiqui

Seeking Accountability.
Preserving Truth.

Danish Siddiqui was a journalist who stood where the story was. His lens captured moments that shaped global understanding, from refugee crises to war zones. His storytelling was grounded in empathy, clarity, and a deep sense of responsibility.

He won two Pulitzer Prizes, earned global recognition, and inspired many. But to those who knew him, he was also a son, a husband, a father, and a friend. He lived by the values that journalism demands: being present, asking hard questions, and holding space for the truth.

On July 16, 2021, Danish was killed while reporting from Spin Boldak, Afghanistan. Official accounts described it as crossfire. But the facts that emerged later revealed troubling gaps in preparation, protection, and institutional support.

This page aims to explore those questions. It is about setting the record straight, honouring Danish’s life and work, and reflecting on the responsibilities that come with sending journalists into danger. His loss must not fade into silence. It must lead to clarity and accountability.

Ignored Security Warnings, No Clear Action?

Advisories reportedly raised concerns. Clarity is lacking on response actions.

Was a Risk Assessment Conducted?

No publicly available documentation confirms a formal risk assessment process.

Why Was He Sent Back to the Field?

After an earlier RPG attack, the basis for continued deployment is unclear.

Lack of Protective Measures?

Information on protective planning for this assignment has not been disclosed.

Silence on Taliban Brutality?

No public statement has addressed post-death images or Taliban conduct.

Setting the Record Straight.

Myth vs Fact

1

Danish Siddiqui was initially believed killed in crossfire

Danish did not die in crossfire. Independent investigations, including those by the BBC and other credible sources, have reported that Danish was captured alive, subjected to torture, and killed in cold blood. Details from these reports also describe signs of post-mortem mutilation. These accounts raise serious questions that warrant further transparency and accountability.

2

All safety protocols were thoroughly followed before his deployment

Information shared by the family and highlighted in investigative reports indicates that critical risk assessments and on-ground security advisories may not have been formally conducted, properly documented, or fully acted upon in the lead-up to Danish Siddiqui’s final deployment. These gaps raise concerns about the safety protocols in place for journalists covering high-risk conflict zones.

3

Family received institutional support in their legal efforts

According to public statements made by the family, they have undertaken the pursuit of justice entirely on their own. This includes reaching out to legal bodies and international forums to seek clarity and accountability, all without receiving institutional legal representation, assistance, or formal backing from the organization Danish was associated with at the time.

4

Raising these important questions is about assigning blame

This is not about blame. It is about seeking transparency, accountability, and learning from the past to strengthen protections for journalists reporting from high-risk environments. Asking questions honours the values Danish Siddiqui stood for — truth, courage, and responsibility — and ensures that similar lapses are not repeated for others working on the frontlines of conflict.

"The way his (Danish's) body was mutilated is condemnable," says Afghan Journalists' Safety Committee chief Najeeb Sharifi.
"He was not simply killed in a crossfire, nor was he simply collateral damage; rather, he was brutally murdered by the Taliban"
"Head, Chest Crushed Under an SUV by the Taliban. Even after his barbaric killing, the body was dragged mercilessly & mutilated"
"Face was unrecognizable, that there were dozens of bullet holes in his body, and that there were tire marks on both his face and chest."

Justice Begins With Truth

A Family’s Fight for Answers

Since Danish’s death, his parents have carried forward the questions he never got to ask. In the face of profound personal loss, they have remained committed to seeking the truth. Their focus has been on understanding the decisions that led to his deployment, the safety measures taken, and the events that followed.

They have done this alone. Despite Danish’s long-standing association with the organisations he worked with, his family has received no support in their efforts to seek justice or transparency.

They have approached legal bodies, international institutions, and the International Criminal Court, guided by their belief that unanswered questions must not be left unspoken.

It has been a difficult and often isolating effort. But their pursuit of justice is a reminder that when institutions fall silent, people still act. Their quiet determination speaks not just for their son, but for every journalist whose life ended in the field, far from clarity or closure.

Honoring a Journalist, Demanding Answers

Justice is not only a legal pursuit. It is a moral commitment to those who can no longer speak for themselves.

Danish Siddiqui’s death is not just a personal tragedy. It is a reminder of what is at stake when those who report from the frontlines are failed — in preparation, in support, and in memory.

This is not about blame. It is about refusing to look away. About insisting that courage, truth, and human dignity must be honoured not just in words but in action.

Timeline of Events

Chronology of key moments before, during, and after Danish Siddiqui’s assignment in Spin Boldak, Afghanistan.

Gaps and Unanswered Questions

Unresolved concerns about safety protocols, decision-making, and post-incident response surrounding Danish Siddiqui’s final assignment.

What the Official Story Says

Outlines the company’s public account of events and highlights areas where information remains limited or unclear.

Why It Matters

Highlights the need for accountability, journalist safety, and recognition of Danish Siddiqui’s legacy and contribution.

International CRIMINAL COURT

Call for Investigation

To the Office of the Prosecutor,

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), an independent, nonprofit organization that promotes press freedom worldwide, has long campaigned for justice in the cases of murdered journalists. From 2011 to 2021, no one has been held to account in 81 percent of the journalist murders worldwide, according to CPJ research. This widespread failure of governments around the world to hold the perpetrators of attacks against journalists to account is a key factor undermining global press freedom.

Given the need for credible investigations and justice as a deterrent in journalist killings, CPJ strongly supports the submission by the family of photojournalist Danish Siddiqui calling for a formal investigation into the circumstances of his death by the International Criminal Court.

Siddiqui was killed on July 16, 2021, in the Spin Boldak district of Afghanistan’s Kandahar province, while covering the conflict there with the news agency Reuters. On March 22, 2022, Siddiqui’s family filed a petition with the ICC against several senior Taliban leaders and calling for an investigation to identify those who carried out the killing. The family’s submission presents a compelling set of facts that, as described in the petition, concern “the attack on, torture, and unlawful killing of war correspondent, Mr. Danish Siddiqui.” CPJ urges the ICC to act on this petition in order to seek justice for Siddiqui’s family.

An ICC investigation into this case and the search for justice is especially important considering the conditions in Afghanistan, where human rights are suffering a massive reversal. In CPJ’s 2021 impunity rankings, which measure the countries where the killers of journalists most often go free, Afghanistan ranked fifth. There is now little prospect that the 17 journalists murdered for their work in the last 10 years will see even a semblance of justice in an Afghan court.

Since the Taliban took control, CPJ has documented a steady increase in a range of attacks on journalists who are simply reporting the news, including arbitrary detentions and sometimes severe physical abuse. In an extremely worrisome trend, increasingly, attacks on journalists are perpetrated by the Taliban General Directorate of Intelligence, as CPJ has documented.

The launch of an ICC investigation into Siddiqui’s death would serve as an unmistakable signal that journalists should not be targeted, and the deadly silencing of their reporting will not be tolerated by the international community.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Robert Mahoney
Executive Director
Committee to Protect Journalists

How You Can Support

Danish Siddiqui’s work continues to speak for those whose voices are often unheard. Your support can help keep that mission alive and ensure that the call for accountability is not forgotten.

01

Amplify the story

Share this page and verified information to help more people understand why justice and accountability are essential.

02

Use your voice

Whether you are a teacher, writer, or student, include this case in conversations about ethics, safety, and truth in journalism.

03

Collaborate with Us

If you represent a media body, civil society group, or legal aid network, reach out for partnerships to strengthen this cause together

04

Stay Informed

Share this page and verified information to help more people understand why justice and accountability are essential.